Patrick,
>I don't mean to suggest that as a means to avoid fixing any known issues
>with the current version but I do mean to suggest that if we can devise
>a schedule after ODF 1.2 is out the door for the production of
>subsequent versions, that will encourage a better development process.
+1, with (basic) digital signature support, RDF and OpenFormula, ODF 1.2
is a real improvement over 1.1
But then we should focus on improved change tracking, additional work and
some very minor cleanup in an ODF 1.2.1 (or 1.3 or profile, whatever) that
does not break the compatibility with 1.2, within a 6 - 9 months timeframe.
Best regards
Bart
