Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [office] Preparing ballot text -- I need your CT links

From
Robin LaFontaine <>
Date
2012-07-26T08:04:17+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [office] Preparing ballot text -- I need your CT links
Rob,

      

      Thanks - that makes sense and your wording on the ballot is good.
      I was anxious that adoption of a method at this stage would be
      premature, but if that is not the case then my concerns are met.
      Peer review is an important part of the process, and focus makes
      sense at this stage.

      

      Regards,

      Robin

    

    On 25/07/2012 18:25,  wrote:
    Hi Robin,
      

      

      Nothing is really adopted in any
        formal
        sense until it is written up and included in the specification,
        and even
        then it requires a series of votes to advance it from a
        Committee Draft
        to a Committee Specification to an OASIS Standard.  On the
        middle
        vote the specification will require 2/3 approval of TC members.
         That
        ultimately is what ensures that our published work has a high
        degree of
        consensus.
      

      

      What the present vote
        accomplishes is
        to focus our efforts toward removing the imperfections from a
        single approach
        rather than trying to simultaneously remove the imperfections
        from three
        different approaches.  But until we have an actual specification
        to
        vote on, this is a preliminary step, but not the formal adoption
        of any
        specification material.
      

      

      Regards,
      

      

      -Rob
Next in thread → Next in month →