Next in thread → Next in month →

[OASIS Issue Tracker] (OFFICE-4088) "implementation-defined" vs. "implementation defined"

From
OASIS Issues Tracker <>
Date
2020-07-20T16:30:03+00:00
ID
Thread
[OASIS Issue Tracker] (OFFICE-4088) "implementation-defined" vs. "implementation defined"
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Patrick Durusau updated OFFICE-4088:
------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: ODF 1.4

> "implementation-defined" vs. "implementation defined"
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-4088
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4088
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Regina Henschel
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: ODF 1.4
>
>
> Section 1.2 Terminology in Part 2, ODF 1.3, defines the term "implementation-defined". But I find it as "implementation defined" (without dash) in
> 4.16.11Â manifest:preferred-view-mode, part 2
> 4.17 manifest:PGPAlgorithm, part 2
> 3.4 Host-Defined Behaviors, part 4
> In addition, 4.17 has wrong character style in that sentence.
> Having both, makes a search for "implementation-defined" terms unnecessary difficult. So in case not the defined term "implementation-defined" is intended, the wording should be changed to avoid "implementation defined".
> I think, that it should be with dash in 4.17 and consider that as editorial error.
> I'm not sure about the other cases.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.3#803004)
Next in thread → Next in month →