Re: [office] Review of ODF 1.4 Part 3 WD02

From
Svante Schubert <>
Date
2022-05-09T12:24:09+00:00
ID
CAHNbw8=
Thread
Re: [office] Review of ODF 1.4 Part 3 WD02
Hi Francis, Hi Patrick,

I have finished my batch.

There were three steps I took for review in general as my "fix-review-pattern":

A) Is the schema correctly changed (optional)

B) Is the text of the resolution within the draft of the specification. Â
C) Is the Issue mentioned in the Appendix.

In addition to Schema Review A), I compared once the overall draft RNG with the one from ODF 1.3, if 

the issue# exists for all changes

the issue# is written ahead of the changes

Starting with the latterÂfull review of schema
A) Schema Review - Full RNG Comparison
===================================
General remarks on the RNG changes, I did a comparison between the WD and ODF 1.3 release.
I guess Michael & Regina have already mentioned some before, just for completeness:

1) Issue after change in Line 2788 Office-3759
2) Without issue no line 4907:
    <rng:attribute name="draw:extrusion-specularity">
     <rng:ref name="percent"/>
    </rng:attribute>
3) Without issue no line 12226:
   <rng:optional>
    <rng:attribute name="style:margin-gutter">
    Â<rng:ref name="nonNegativeLength"/>
    </rng:attribute>
   </rng:optional>

4) Last line too much:
   <!-- Office-4108 -->
   <rng:zeroOrMore>
    <rng:ref name="number-num-list-format"/>
   </rng:zeroOrMore>
   Â<rng:zeroOrMore>

OFFICE-4105
===========

A) Review of Schema Change

Comment of issue numbers is missing in schema change (line# 12226).

Â(BTW this issue was not listed in issue review spreadsheet as schema change!)

B) Review of Specification Changes: 

in 19.511 style:page-usage

a) Attribute Value character style should be used for the attribute values

at the beginning of the list

in the later paragraphs and tables
b) Formatting of Chapter# 19.511 after the list seems odd.

in 20.322 style:margin-gutter
a) Wrong formatting in the beginning.
b) Default Value style should be used for 0 in "The default value for this attribute is 0."

C) Review of Appendix Entry
Issue correctly mentioned in Appendix!

OFFICE-4073
===========

A) Review of Schema Changes

Schema change looks fine!  ÂÂ

B) Review of Specification Changes

a) Page-content-bottom: vertical position ...
  ^^The value starts with a minor "p" not "P".
b) Above value should have the attribute-value character style! Â Â Â
c) The new value should be listed as well in the last box starting with: 
    "The values of the style:vertical-rel attribute are"
    (was not part of the proposal but needs to be added!)
   Â
C) Review of Appendix Entry
Issue correctly mentioned in Appendix!
    
OFFICE-4033
===========

A) Review of Schema Changes

No Schema change was necessary!

B) Review of Specification Changes:

Changes in the spec are according to our resolution:

  https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4033
  
C) Review of Appendix Entry
Issue correctly mentioned in Appendix!

Kind regards,

Svante

Am So., 8. Mai 2022 um 23:05ÂUhr schrieb Francis Cave <>:

Hi Regina

Thank you for your quick work! Although it isn't specifically on the agenda for tomorrow's TC call, I think I'll await the outcome of any comments about the review process in tomorrow's call, before allocating any more of the batches.

Kind regards,

Francis

-----Original Message-----

From:  <> On Behalf Of Regina Henschel

Sent: 08 May 2022 18:30

To: Francis Cave <>

Cc: 'ODF TC List' <>

Subject: Re: [office] Review of ODF 1.4 Part 3 WD02

Hi Francis,

Francis Cave schrieb am 06.05.2022 um 19:24:

> Hi Regina

> 

> If/when you have time, please review batch 9 on the attached revised spreadsheet.

> 

> Many thanks!

> 

OASIS-4119

===========

Issue resolution field: OK

Changes in text: OK

Appendix G: Item 19.882.12Â <text:index-entry-link-end> is missing.

Schema is not affected.

OASIS-4102

==========

all OK

OASIS-3751

==========

Issue resolution field: Should have a text like "Change in schema as proposed".

Changes in text: OK

Appendix G: OK

Schema: OK

OASIS-3816

==========

Issue resolution field is empty.

Changes in text: OK

Appendix G: OK

Schema is not affected.

Kind regards,

Regina

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 

generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php