Re: [office] Agenda for August 15th ODF TC Teleconference meeting
Hi,
please see below
On 2022-08-13 8:32 a.m., Regina
Henschel wrote:
Hi
Andreas,
your mail did not go to the list, but wording indicates, that is
was intended for the list. In that case you can forward my answer
to the list.
Andreas J Guelzow schrieb am 11.08.2022 um 04:07:
Hi,
I appreciate Regina's suggestion of a compromise but it still
widens what is considered a conforming OpenDocument Document. I
have no issue with widening the definition of a conforming
OpenDocument Extended Document but I still think that
interoperability with respect to conforming OpenDocument
Document should not so completely depend on the goodwill of the
implementers.
I do not see, that it widens the current definition of
"conforming".
In my understanding the current conformance clause 2.2.1 D.3) does
not say, that the namespace shall be
"urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2". But it says, _if_
the used namespace is
"urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2", then syntax and
semantic shall conform to Part 4.
I read this as that the conformance clause provides only two
options.
Moreover, since the document cannot be interpreted reasonably
without the consumer being able to understand these attribute
values the third option cannot be acceptable.
As I mentioned in the meetings, using a differnet name-space is
akin to using foreign elements. So it should at most be allowed in
conforming Extended OpenDocument Documents.
Andreas
(The remainder of Regina's message has been omitted.)
--
Andreas J. Guelzow,
PhD FTICA
Registrar
& Associate Vice-President,
Enrolment and Planning
Professor,
Mathematical & Computing
Sciences
Direct:
+1 780 479 9290
Toll-Free: +1 866 479 5200
concordia.ab.ca