on a semi-related note, I've removed the google doc link for the moment, but I will have another form of it for the mailing list to edit shortly.
Anyhow, what format do you have in mind for this? Are you saying you want a line by line comparison? Or are you saying from the perspective of order of things we are doing? Please share your idea you have in mind.
Best Regards,
Matthew B. Reingold
CSP - Fire Protection, ROHS,CITS, Water Systems
-----------------------------
Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
E:
E:
P:847.553.8097
P:847.664.1305
F:847-574-4005
UL Customer Service is available to assist you in the U.S. Monday - Friday 7am - 7pm CST.
Visit us Globally at http://www.ul.com.
*****The Standard in Safety*****
Any information and documentation involving UL Mark services are provided on behalf of Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL) or any authorized license of UL.
Disclaimer: Any opinions expressed are my own personal opinions and not representative of Underwriters Laboratories
Would it not be better to structure this process a bit, say by
starting with the ODF Spec and then allocating interoperability
requirements to each part?
Jerome Davies
IT Manager
PDG Helicopters
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
The information in this email is confidential and is intended
solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient any
disclosure,copying,distribution or action taken or omitted to
be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Please also contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.
PLM Dollar Group Limited trading as PDG Helicopters is
registered in Scotland No. 157532 with its address: The
Heliport, Dalcross, Inverness, IV2 7XB
Please visit our website at www.pdg-helicopters.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:
