← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates.

From
<>
Date
2008-06-12T19:59:26+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates.
Norbert Bollow <> wrote on 06/12/2008
03:11:09 PM:

>  wrote:

> 

> > So far I've heard the following items (in no particular order)

> > 

> > 1) A conformance test of ODF documents and implementations, i.e.,
test the 

> > formal shall's and should's, etc.

> > 2) An Acid-style test of ODF implementations, i.e., feature and

> > rendering-oriented, essentially highlighting ODF features that
are not 

> > widely implemented (or implemented correctly) but are desired
(by whom???)

> > 3) A comprehensive test suite of atomic (single feature) tests

> > 4) A formal profile of ODF for portability and archiving, aka
ODF/A

> > 5) A formal profile of ODF for browser-based applications

> > 6) A formal profile of ODF for mobile devices

> > 7) A report on best practices for authoring portable documents

> > 8) A periodic interoperability report on the state of ODF 

> > interoperability, with specific recommendations for implementors.

> > 

> > What did I miss?

> > 

> > Let's get the list complete

> 

> Hmm how/where would the specific interoperability needs of persons

> with disabilities get addressed?

Hi Norbert,

The ODF TC has an Accessibility Subcommittee that
has performed a study of ODF accessibility, and has proposed features to
enhance accessibility in ODF 1.1 and ODF 1.2.  They also produced
an Accessibility Guidelines document which was recently released as a Committee
Specification: 

http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/office-accessibility/v1.0/cs01/ODF_Accessibility_Guidelines-v1.0.odt

I think the proposed IIC TC should include include
tests of interoperability features in its compliance and interoperability
tests.  But we probably would not want to create a test suite based
on the recommendations of the ODF Accessibility Guidelines document unless
we first negotiated that with the members of the Accessibility Subcommittee.
 

-Rob
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread