2008/6/18 <>:
>> Nice to see we are not the only ones who have difficulty coming up with
>> a definitive description of a profile. I think it is saying something
>> when a "sample" of a profile is given to describe what a profile is.
>> Sort of like using a word to describe itself.
>>
>> I believe the Wikipedia definition is the most generic and probably the
>> most appropriate for our needs here. (of those listed)
>>
>
> But don't forget the ISO definition that I sent out a few days ago: "a
> "harmonised document which identifies a standard or group of standards,
> together with options and parameters, necessary to accomplish a function or
> set of functions".
Which is not much use in our context Rob?
(Not that I understand it anyway in our context)
As I said, as used on this list.
Not to be part of the TOR of the TC so it doesn't necessarily have
to be called
up from this groups output.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
