2008/6/20 marbux <>:
> The need for this proposed TC depends on its goals. If the goal is
> both interoperability and compatibility with ODF, there is no need for
> this TC because this TC is not the master of the language used by the
> ODF TC to specify ODF.
I disagree with this statement Paul.
My proposed approach.
1. A full testability assessment of the current ODF standard.
2. Produce a compliance test specification which is objective and implementable.
3. Report back to the main TC on areas unclear|untestable|lacking.
4. Interop can be derived from testability I believe.
Only then can you start to make objective claims to (lack of) interop.
If the main TC ignore the recommendations?
A seperable issue.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
