2008/6/23 <>:
>
> "Dave Pawson" <> wrote on 06/22/2008 07:57:33 AM:
>>
>>
>> This is why the TC needs to be able to feed these examples back to the
>> main TC for cleanup.
>> This should be a deliverable.
>>
>
> Would you want this as a formal report, where the proposed TC reviews the
> ODF standard and comes up with a list of such ambiguous clauses, much as the
> Accessibility TC reviewed ODF 1.0 and wrote up recommendations?
I see this as a side effect of reviewing the spec for conformance checks?
And yes, I think it should be a formal report (with early access if feasible)
to the main TC, with a clear expectation that a response is given to each
and every clause.
>
> Or are you suggesting that these instances would be naturally found in the
> process of creating our test requirements document, and as we search for
> testable provisions in the ODF standard, such ambiguous statements would be
> reported, individually, to the ODF TC?
Too easy for this to be lost in the noise. I'll give credence to Pauls
view here. Especially since Oasis
has no bugzilla system to retain a log on public view.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
