2008/6/30 David Gerard <>:
> 2008/6/30 Ben Baston <>:
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Craig A. Eddy <> wrote:
>
>>> +1 in general, though I agree that your proposal might need some
>>> re-wording ... found one sentence to be worded in a slightly confused way.
>> Certainly agree - edited myself into a corner, I did! Apologies to all and
>> perhaps this is less confusing. Or not. Again, as an interoperability
>> concept fundamental to the OICC TC, some variation of the below is humbly
>> suggested:
+1 to the idea.
Constraining it to the purpose of this group:
Proposed amendment.
That any extension to ODF (appropriate version) be recognised by
compliance testing and
the tester informed.
To get that from the TC, our deliverable should be:
"Deliverable:
A means of identifying extensions to ODF and adding an warning
comment to the test output"
Any wordsmithing on that to clarify?
That is in scope.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
