Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft Interoperability and ConformanceTC formation proposal (0.2)

Dave,

I don't normally even acknowledge this sort of thing, but....

Dave Pawson wrote:
> 2008/7/24  <>:
>   
>
<snip>
>> It is fair to let you know that I intend to move this forward into a formal
>> proposal for a new TC soon, well before the 90 day period of the discussion
>> list has expired.
>>     
>
>
> IOW you really didn't need the input from this group at all?
>
> Others please note. Rob has no need of consensus from this group
> according to the (lack of ) Oasis process for TC formation.
>
>   
Isn't there enough of a lack of civility and common courtesy in the 
discussions around OOXML to satisfy everyone in the ODF "camp?"

This sort of comment isn't going to advance the discussion of a charter 
for the proposed "Interoperability and Conformance TC."

But, then I don't think abusing people who work for IBM is any more 
likely to lead to useful discussion than abusing anyone else.

It isn't brave, clever or whatever labels the self-anointed saviors of 
the world choose to apply to themselves.

It is, in a word, noise. Nothing more or less.

Otherwise hopeful that everyone is looking forward to a great weekend!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau

Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)