← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

FW: [Non-DoD Source] [openc2-lang] Groups - Language Specification for Initial Agreement uploaded

From
Brule, Joseph M <>
Date
2017-09-27T11:53:50+00:00
ID
Thread
FW: [Non-DoD Source] [openc2-lang] Groups - Language Specification for Initial Agreement uploaded
Meant ot reply to all, only replied to Duncan….

 

The gist of it is;  do comments on the googledocs that Jason R is bookboss on, Duncan will handle the versioning of the smaller subsections.  I think this is
 a good approach.

 

VR

 

Joe B

 

From: Duncan [mailto:]

Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 11:07 PM

To: Brule, Joseph M <>

Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] [openc2-lang] Groups - Language Specification for Initial Agreement uploaded

 

I think you only sent this to me (i.e. No "everybody else").

It's first a google docs that I put in the incoming directory as a sfractal contribution.

Then I made a PDF of that, which I put out as OASIS contribution.

Yes I will maintain keeping both (gdoc and PDF) in sync with the real working draft.

I'm on vacation this week so I'll be slow in responding and won't be doing as much as normal.

 

iPhone, iTypo, iApologize

 

Duncan Sparrell

sFractal Consulting, LLC

The closer you look, the more you see

_____________________________

From: Brule, Joseph M <>

Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 11:37 AM

Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] [openc2-lang] Groups - Language Specification for Initial Agreement uploaded

To: 'Duncan Sparrell' <>

Duncan,

 

Thank you! I agree that we do not need to boil the proverbial ocean and working smaller pieces like this is a good idea.  I am pretty sure that we reopened the
 modifier issue (I did a slew of comments on the long version of the language spec) 

 

Question:  Do you intend to keep the ‘short version’ as pdf, then periodically update it via the comments captured on the long version?

 

Everyone else,

 

I like Duncan’s approach;  Let’s get agreement on the (KMN for using this cliché) framework then iteratively develop the entire doc. 

 

Talk to you in a couple hours.

 

VR

 

Joe B

 

From:  [mailto:]On Behalf Of
Duncan Sparrell

Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 9:45 PM

To: 

Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [openc2-lang] Groups - Language Specification for Initial Agreement uploaded

 

Submitter's message

This document is a contribution from sFractal Consulting (ie not Duncan as LSC co-chair, but as corporate contributor) for discussion at the 26-Sep Language Subcommittee meeting.

The working draft of the Language Specification is on google drive and is 150+ pages long and there are several issues still being worked. On google drive sFractal has submitted his view of what he believes we have agreed to. This is a pdf of that file and
 is only 20 pages (mostly boilerplate). 

It probably is still too long. The intent is to find where there is agreement and start there. If there are sections of this document that do not have consensus then I would propose to remove those as well (eg Response and/or Alert sections).

What has been left in is just the 'actions'. The only property tables are the overall openc2 table and the actions table. The rest are still in the working draft but removed from this initial draft for approval.

I would propose the LSC agree to bring this stripped down version to the TC to start the Committee Draft Spec approval process

-- Mr. Duncan Sparrell 

Document Name:Language
 Specification for Initial Agreement

Description

This document is a contribution from sFractal Consulting (ie not Duncan as

LSC co-chair, but as corporate contributor).

The working draft of the Language Specification is on google drive and is

150+ pages long and there are several issues still being worked. On google

drive sFractal has submitted his view of what he believes we have agreed

to. This is a pdf of that file and is only 20 pages (mostly boilerplate). 

It probably is still too long. The intent is to find where there is

agreement and start there. If there are sections of this document that do

not have consensus then I would propose to remove those as well (eg

Response and/or Alert sections).

What has been left in is just the 'actions'. The only property tables are

the overall openc2 table and the actions table. The rest are still in the

working draft but removed from this initial draft for approval.

I would propose the LSC agree to bring this stripped down version to the TC

to start the Committee Draft Spec approval process 

Download Latest Revision

Public Download Link

Submitter: Mr. Duncan Sparrell

Group: OpenC2 Language Subcommittee

Folder: Working Drafts

Date submitted: 2017-09-25 18:44:12
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →