Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [openc2-lang] RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [openc2-lang] We need your input on: mandatory vs optional, Header, id, version, timestamp, sender

From
Trey Darley <>
Date
2018-01-29T15:08:35+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [openc2-lang] RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [openc2-lang] We need your input on: mandatory vs optional, Header, id, version, timestamp, sender
On 26.01.2018 21:09:48, Mathews, Mary L wrote:
> I also want to echo the point made by Duncan earlier that OpenC2 is
> a language, not a protocol.
> 

Given that the majority of computer languages are versioned, this line
of argument strikes me as specious, at best.

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Director of Standards Development, New Context
gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F  018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache
invalidation and naming things." --Phil Karlton
Next in thread → Next in month →