Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [openc2-lang] RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [openc2-lang] Fwd: mistake inside oc2ls-v1.0-cs02
It's a language issue, so seems to me that one of Toby (co-chair), Duncan (LS co-editor), or DaveK (all around language SME) should run point. Dave David Lemire, CISSP Systems Engineer HII Mission Driven Innovative Solutions (HII-MDIS) â formerly G2, Inc. Technical Solutions Division 302 Sentinel Drive | Annapolis Junction, MD 20701 Email: Work: 301-575-5190 | Mobile: 240-938-9350 On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:50 PM Brule, Joseph M <> wrote: Did anyone respond to Mr. Rome in this matter? If not, would oyu like me to run point?  From: <> On Behalf Of Brian Berliner Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 9:50 AM To: duncan sfractal.com <> Cc: openc2-lang <> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [openc2-lang] Fwd: mistake inside oc2ls-v1.0-cs02  There are a lot more numbers than â21â missing in the Action table. We removed some early actions from the table before we released the final version. I also thought that it looked weird that we didnât re-number the table to make it perfectly sequential, but in reality they are just identifiers and it doesnât matter what the number is... but the number assigned in the table should never change.  For all of us currently, we use JSON, so the numbers are not even used at all, so this is reserved for when we add binary encodings.  So, yes. 21 is missing (and lots of others). That is weird, but by design, and it actually doesnât matter that they are not perfectly sequential in the table.... Except for the fact that I had to just write this exactly because they are not perfectly sequential in the finals spec!    -Brian  On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:49 AM duncan sfractal.com <> wrote: The attached email went to the public comments email. Since I am not sure everyone monitors that channel, I am forwarding to LSC to look at  iPhone, iTypo, iApologize  Duncan Sparrell sFractal Consulting, LLC I welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at http://vsre.info/  From: <> on behalf of Vincent ROME <> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 6:16 AM To: Subject: [openc2-comment] mistake inside oc2ls-v1.0-cs02  Hello, I'm currently reading the specification and try to make my own python implementation and I found that : In page 29 of the oc2ls-v1.0-cs02 The number "21" is miss inside the board   -- Cheers,    -Brian Â
Next in thread →
Next in month →