Hi Lars,
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 15:02:30 +0200, Lars Oppermann wrote:
> The example given by Stefan looks to me as if it would go right down to
> the core of this particular issue.
>
> I agree, that 8.1 implies, that both fragments given in the example
> should render the same. However, from what Niklas has told me, they
> should not - as the intention was that @dcsn not be applied to omitted
> cells.
Note the explanation I just posted to the od-users list, clarifying on
the "empty cells (just like in an empty sheet)", which does not refer to
empty <table:table-cell> elements, so the two examples indeed should not
render the same.
Eike
