Jan
> I would not use whatever validator. The proven one, used also by quite
> some developers lives at odftoolkit.org.
As the developer of the new Office-o-tron validator that you're advising against using, I'd be interested to know in what sense you judge the odftoolkit.org validator "proven"?
Are you aware that the odftoolkit.org has special-casing code to ignore certain faults in documents produced by OpenOffice.org? (See for example from lines 55 and 79 at http://is.gd/13dM8 ). The full list of such changes is at http://is.gd/13dYp .
The Office-o-tron validator is written to carry out a "pure" validation without favouring any particular implementation. You can see the source at:
http://code.google.com/p/officeotron/source/browse/#svn/trunk/src/org/probatron/officeotron
Comments on this are welcome!
- Alex.
