Hi again
The main issue with the RM specs (relating to section “2.4 resource formats “) is now resolved, as we discussed in the telco.
Only some minor issues remain as indicated in the updated Word document.
regards
______________________________
Jad El-khoury,
PhD
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Mechatronics Division
Brinellvägen 83, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Phone: +46(0)8 790 6877 Mobile: +46(0)70 773 93 45
,
www.kth.se
From: Jad El-Khoury
Sent: 04 April 2018 00:46
To:
Subject: [OSLC Domains] Actions on the TC reviews
Dear all,
I have now made the suggested changes to the RM specs, raised from the latest discussion on “Reified relationships in RM domain”.
I order to finalize the review comments I received from Martin & Mark, I would love to get your input on some of the remaining issues.
Martin, Mark, Jim & Nick!
Can I ask for your input on specific comments raised in the document
https://github.com/oasis-tcs/oslc-domains/blob/master/rm/OSLC%20RM%20TC%20Reviews.docx
It is also attached for your convenience.
I have tagged each row where I need your input with your name.
Please feel free to simply add your respond in that same column “action left” and I can take it from there.
Otherwise, the only remaining issue that we are awaiting a decision from the Core TC relates to “resource formats” (rdf/xml, turtle).
regards
______________________________
Jad El-khoury, PhD
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Mechatronics Division
Brinellvägen 83, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Phone: +46(0)8 790 6877 Mobile: +46(0)70 773 93 45
,
www.kth.se
Attachment:
OSLC RM TC Reviews.docx
Description: OSLC RM TC Reviews.docx
