← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
oslc:range oslc:AnyResource or more specific resource type?
I got my analysis mixed up. The more specific oslc:range assertions came from the resource shapes created for RQM. The QM 2.0 spec, https://archive.open-services.net/bin/view/Main/QmSpecificationV2.html,uses any for all the relationship names. So I think we should be consistent with the 2.0 spec and leave the oslc:AnyResource. Jim Amsden, Senior Technical Staff Member OSLC and Linked Lifecycle Data 919-525-6575
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread