Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [pki-tc] EEMA pki Challenge papers

From
Anders Rundgren <>
Date
2003-06-25T18:50:23+00:00
ID
006c01c33b4c$c2bf0e00$0500a8c0@arport
Thread
Re: [pki-tc] EEMA pki Challenge papers
Title: 

Paul,

Thanx for the information.  It looked OK but 
the authors have reduced the scope to x.509-related things that is not where the 
major problem is today (as existing PKIs are mostly local).

 

I can report from Sweden that the e-governments 
have practically came to a standstill, not due to x.509 issues but due to 
the business models of the CAs involved.  One of the CAs requires end-users 
(citizens) to perform a time-consuming operation and pay some $30 to get a 
certificate, while a consortium of banks provide certificates for free by 
clicking on a button in the citizens on-line bank.  I can testify that this 
is really nice.   However, the "verifier" have to pay 25-60 cents for 
each status check as described in the following document: http://www.x-obi.com/OBI400/e-government-ID-A.Rundgren.pdf which 
works fine for the yearly IRS-declaration but not at all for frequent login to 
health-care portals etc.

 

Personally I believe the destiny of the four-corner 
model is the single most important question for wide-spread use of PKI in the 
society.  A delegation of public sector officials will talk to the 
Swedish government this fall and require CA business model 
"normalization".

 

Another problem is that we still don't have a cheap 
and standardized key-containers (smart card or similar) supported directly by 
the OS vendors.

 

br

Anders Rundgren

  
----- Original Message ----- 

  
From: 
  Evans Paul 
  

  
To: pki-tc 

  
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 
19:35

  
Subject: [pki-tc] EEMA pki Challenge 
  papers

  

At Steve Hanna's suggestion, I'm providing links to some 
  significant papers that are now available to the public and that we can 
  leverage in our work.  

The European Electronic Messaging 
  Association (EEMA) worked to carry forward the Challenge work of the EMA in 
  North America in the form of their pki Challenge (pkiC). They made 
  considerable effort to identify issues that impact interoperability and the 
  deployment of PKI. They have succeeded in producing exceptionally useful 
  materials that advance the understanding of PKI deployment issues. The EEMA 
  reported out their results in April and released three additional papers last 
  week.

The most applicable document to the PKI TC is the paper titled 
  "Challenges for 
  the PKI Industry" (92kb pdf).  Aimed at standards bodies, the 
  European Commission, other groups with an interest in this area, and other 
  participants, this paper outlines some of the technical challenges still 
  facing the industry.  Steve and I agree that it is an especially clear 
  analysis of some of the main problems that must  be addressed for PKI to 
  succeed.  

For those in the vendor community, I suggest reviewing 
  the pkiC's "Recommendations 
  for vendors" (112kb pdf).  This document considers the implications 
  for the vendor community in light of the conclusions of the pkiC, and makes 
  recommendations about the features and levels of support for standards that 
  PKI products should exhibit to encourage interoperability between users of 
  different vendors' products.

An excellent read for organizations that 
  are embarking on a PKI deployment is their "Best Practice of 
  PKI users"  (129kb pdf).  All PKI products are highly 
  configurable. This paper aims to provide guidance to those organizations that 
  wish to benefit from the services they can deliver, but who also wish to 
  deploy and use PKI in a manner that maximizes the chances of interoperability 
  with other PKIs.

The final pki Challenge 
  report (501kb pdf) was released at Infosecurity Europe, London, on April 
  29 2003.  You can also download a FAQ 
  sheet (36kb pdf) showing the highlights of the full report. 

Steve 
  and I encourage everyone to read these as important background for our work, 
  although the survey may also turn up other important 
  issues.

Regards,

Paul Evans
Next in thread → Next in month →