← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

SV: [plcs-tog] OASIS PLCS TC concept model

From
Date
2005-10-06T07:58:30+00:00
ID
Thread
SV: [plcs-tog] OASIS PLCS TC concept model
Title: OASIS PLCS TC concept model

I like the slideshow. Excellent! Much easier to 
follow.

 

Some 
remarks:

- In 
my opinion, 'term' and 'name' are synonymns. A term has no definition. A term 
"labels" a concept. A 'concept' has one or more terms/names and a 
definition (possibly in different languages).

- Is 
'EX ...' short for EXchange or should it be 'DEX ...'?
- 
There are two 'ISO 10303 Application Module' boxes.

- I 
like the idea of not using the 'Business Concept' term. I'm not sure I quite 
understand what you've suggested instead. Could you explain it in 
words?!

Regards, 
  Mats 
- - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mats Nilsson, 
FMV

 

Från: Rutland, Phil [mailto:] 

Skickat: den 5 oktober 2005 17:22
Till: 
''
Ämne: [plcs-tog] OASIS PLCS TC concept 
model

All,

I've been looking at this and come up with the 
attached version.

 

I've 
removed "Business Concept" and tried to identify how OASIS DEX's are created 
along with the link between various reference data levels.

 

It can 
be viewed as a whole or in slideshow mode when it will build (my idea of trying 
to explain it!).

 

Phil 
Rutland

  
-----Original Message-----
From:  
  [mailto:]
Sent: 03 October 2005 
  17:33
To: 
Subject: 
  [plcs-tog] OASIS PLCS TC concept model

  
Hi all, 

  
I was given the task in Amsterdam to produce a 
  first draft of a 'OASIS PLCS TC concept model' in order to help to clarify the 
  meaning of the terms we comunicate between us. Please feel free to modify the 
  document during the discussion. I do not guarantee that the model is correct 
  even at this basic stage. More terms should be inserted and more connections 
  added. 

  
<<OASIS PLCS TC Concept 
  Model.ppt>> 
Two thing are worth 
  mentioning: 

  
1- A suggestion from the TOG meeting in Amsterdam 
  is that the term "DEX" should no longer be used alone. Instead "DEX 
  Specification" should be used when refering to the specifications in DEXlib. 
  Packages of data exchanged between parties are from now on "DEX Files". "DEX 
  ..." is to be read as "Data Exchange ...". Anyone breaking the rule is 
  punished with ten pushups!

  
2- The term "Business Concept" is not clear. 
  Therefore I've introduced the term "Business Concept Specification" for the 
  definition stored in DEXlib. The model hopefully makes this understandable… 
  More explanation regarding this new term (but old concept) is 
  needed.

  
My suggestion is that this concept model (when 
  "completed") will be considered as a guiding document after it has been 
  balloted.

  
Does anyone have access to a proper software 
  modelling tool instead of powerpoint? 

  
Let the fight begin… ;o) 

  
Vänliga hälsningar, 
  Mats 
- - - - - 
  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mats Nilsson 
FMV KE LogMetod, rum 
  C358 

  
PLCS - Product LifeCycle Support [ISO/IEC 
  10303-239:2005] är en standard innehållande ett språk för kommunikation av 
  (underhållsrelaterad) produktinformation mellan IT-system. Mer information 
  finns på iNSiDAN http://insidan.fmv.se/GetPage.asp?sPageId=036003002002001
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →