[regrep-cc-review] RE: RE: [regrep] Core Components Specification 1.8Comments

Title: Core Components Specification 1.8 Comments

Suresh,

 

Thanks very much.  The "special things" that you 
reference are the very essence of the CC Review team's work.  We have 
complete a very detailed analysis of the CC spec v1.8, and are in the process of 
determine how the registry-related requirements in the CC spec (each and every 
one) can be met with our current registry architecture.  We are in the 
midst of determining, for those that cannot be met, what updates will be 
necessary to the registry architecture.

 

Regarding UID: Our recent discussions have 
involved Core Components and their associated entities (BCC's, ACC's, ABIE's, 
BBIE's, etc.) being represented as Intrinsic Objects in the RIM.  What 
follows from this is that any UID issues associated with registered objects will 
be "inherited" by Core Components and their associated entities.  We have 
been keep up-to-date on all of the UID-related discussions, and will continue to 
do so.

 

We 
plan to have a proposal to both the Registry TC and the UN/CEFACT CC team in the 
future - timeframes yet to be firmed up.  Stay tuned!

 

Thanks,

Joe

 

************************************************************************** 

  Joseph M. Chiusano 

  Logistics Management 
Institute 
  2000 
Corporate Ridge 
  
McLean, VA 22102 
  
Email:  
  Tel: 571.633.7722 
************************************************************************** 

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Damodaran, Suresh 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 
  6:46 PM
To: 'CHIUSANO, Joseph'
Cc: 
  ''; 
  ''
Subject: RE: [regrep] Core Components 
  Specification 1.8 Comments

  
Joe, 
  

  
 

  
Thanks to you and others in the cc-review 
  team for this excellent review.

  
During your review, did you attempt to catalog the 
  "special things" that

  
Registry needs to do to support CC? The need for a 
  UID is an example.

  
I am 
  greatly interested in seeing such a list.

  
 

  
CPA 
  has some needs for registry too. Business processes will be 
  advertised

  
in 
  registry too per eb architecture. Since registry is a central element of ebXML 
  architecture, 

  
I am 
  wondering aloud whether there is value in creating a "ebXML-architecture 
  support"

  
document (OK, I am not volunteering, at least not 
  yet:-)) that captures what it takes to support

  
CPPA, CC, and BPSS "natively" using ebXML registry. 
  Does the ebXML architecture

  
group (ebTWG) has any such 
  document?

  
 

  
Thanks,

  
 

  
-Suresh

  
 

  
-----Original Message-----
From: CHIUSANO, Joseph 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 4:11 
  PM
To: ''
Cc: 
  ''; 
  ''
Subject: [regrep] Core Components 
  Specification 1.8 Comments

  
Dear Hans, 

  
Attached please find comments from 
  the Core Components Review subteam of the OASIS/ebXML Registry Technical 
  Committee. 

  
Regards, 
Joe Chiusano 
Chair, Core Components Review Subteam 
  
OASIS/ebXML Registry Technical 
  Committee 

  
<<CC Spec v1.8 Comments - CC 
  REVIEW.xls>> 

  
************************************************************************** 
  
  Joseph M. 
  Chiusano 
  
  Logistics Management Institute 
  2000 Corporate Ridge 
  McLean, VA 22102 
  Email:  
  
  Tel: 571.633.7722 
  
**************************************************************************