Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>CC Review Team,
>
>Welcome! Today begins the official kickoff of our Core Components XML
>Serialization work. I would like to thank you in advance for your
>contributions to this valuable work.
>
>For those who may not have a copy of the December 2002 (v1.9) Core
>Components Technical Specification, please see attached. This week, I
>hope we can accomplish the following:
>
>(1) CCTS Review and Clarification:
>
>- All members please review Section 7 (p.74) of spec, and offer up to
>our listserv any questions you have. This is the section that we will be
>verifying for the UN/CEFACT CCTS Team.
>
>- Please also start thinking in terms of which metadata entities and
>attributes can map to our current RIM architecture, and in what way.
>
Joe,
I tried reading the CCTS spec and am having much trouble digesting it. I
think it would be a good idea, if as a first step, you could schedule a
sub-team meeting and go over the CCTS info model and core concepts. What
do other team members think?
>
>(2) Requirements:
>
>- At our recent Registry TC call, we discussed compiling a list of
>requirements as soon as possible.
>
>- Beyond the obvious requirement that our work comply with the CCTS 1.9
>spec to the greatest degree possible, what are some other requirements?
>
>
>
Other requirement sugestions:
-Must align well with ebXML Registry specs by maximizing leverage and
minimizing overlap.
Deliverables include:
-A specification describing how to represent CC artifacts in XML with an
XML Schema and related semantic rules, design patterns and conventions
as its basis.
--
Farrukh
