<Quote>
Being of data type and defined/restricted by a data type are to me
separate things.
</Quote>
Ah yes - I agree. If changing names of terms to more accurately reflect
their role is beneficial for us, I fully support doing that.
Joe
"Monica J. Martin" wrote:
>
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>
> >Monica,
> >
> >These definitions are straight from the CCTS. Are you suggesting that we
> >request a modification of the CCTS?
> >
> >
> mm1: I'm not sure. Being of data type and defined/restricted by a data
> type are to me separate things. I'll have to look over the
> specification section for context, although on first glance I would like
> others thoughts if it is the same thing.
>
> >Joe
> >
> >"Monica J. Martin" wrote:
> >
> >
> >>*[JMC] Core Components (and Business Information Entities) are of Data
> >>Types. A Data Type defines the possible set of values for a Basic Core
> >>Component (and a Business Information Entity).
> >>*
> >>
> >>· /Core Components /(and /Business Information Entities/) have
> >>/Properties /that are defined by Data Types
> >>
> >>/
> >>/
> >>
> >>*Joe,
> >>*
> >>
> >>*
> >>I would suggest we revisit this definition a bit more. Being defined
> >>by a data type and being of a data type do not appear to me to be the
> >>same thing.
> >>*
> >>
> >>**
> >>
