<Quote>
This would make ordering, as a solution of chunking long values,
unnecessary.
</Quote>
Do you still see a value in ordering if it is not for chunking?
Joe
Nikola wrote:
>
> <Joe>
> The following is a summary of our current Slot issues - please provide
> feedback.
> </Joe>
>
> Here is my feedback re: first two aspects (also, see
> http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200306/msg00051.html):
>
> <Joe>
> (1) Maximum length - a restrictive feature
>
> Slot attribute "values" is of Data Type "Collection of LongName" (128
> characters)
>
> QUESTION: Should the length be increased to (for example) 256
> characters? This may be non-issue if slot values are ordered (see
> below), as they can be "chained together".
>
> (2) Order of Slot values
>
> Slot attribute "values" should be changed from Data Type "Collection of
> LongName" to Data Type "Ordered Collection of LongName".
> </Joe>
>
> I suggest that we don't restrict the length of Slot values. This would make
> ordering, as a solution of chunking long values, unnecessary. I'd like to
> consider the same approach for other attributes, like
> RegistryObject.description, ...
>
> Nikola
>
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php
