>Chiusano1: <Quote1>
>
>
>>QUESTION: Do we need 2 new Association Types here - "ExtendedFrom" and
>>"RestrictedFrom"? Or just simply one Association Type named
>>"DerivedFrom?" If so, should we handle this the same as W3C Schema? > That is, an extension would contain only the additional BCCs, and a
>>restriction would contain the BCCs from the "base" ACC that are being
>>carried over.
>>
>>mm1: I would prefer Association type.
>></Quote1>
>>
>>Chiusano2: Did you mean 1 Association Type or 2?
>>
>>
mm2: Assocation Type 2 - DerivedFrom
