[Fwd: [regrep-cc-review] Core Components Issue: Representation of Aggregate Core Components]

Forwarding from the CCTS Team, with my comments (with all due respect to
the poster of the e-mail below):

<Quote1>
There will likely be no Buyer Address ACC but Order. Buyer Address.
Address ASCC 
</Quote1>

I disagree - we will need to have a "BuyerAddress" ACC in the registry,
so that it can be used by multiple ASCCs. It's all about layers here.

<Quote2>
I think there is at least a strong reason to store all CCs and BIEs as
separate entries with unique (U)UIDs for harmonization among industry
standards.
</Quote2>

<Quote3>
I completely concur - for reasons additional to harmonization.
I am not sure though how the registry will store the model
(meaning provide connection among ACC, ASCC, BCC, ABIE, ASBIE, and BIE).
I think that the Dictionary entry name can do the job (if there is no
truncation).
</Quote3>

The Dictionary entry name is not intended to serve this purpose - of
course, we'll use Associations.

Joe