Re: [regrep-semantic] ebXML Registry Profile for OWL Draft 1: Farrukhscomments #1

asuman wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> These emails are very technical. So I will appreciate if we use
> only the  and
>  threads.
Just to clarify, Asuman meant to not copy the emails to the Dr. 
Frederix, Prof. Tokyay and Prof. Gumrah.

I would go a step further and say that we should only copy SC list and 
its members. The list is open so any one
can join who is on the  list. Sound ok?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Asuman
>
>  wrote:
>
>> A few other comments on Farrukh's comments:
>>
>>  
>>
>>> Line 187-189:
>>>
>>> "In OWL, properties can have
>>> multiple domains and multiple ranges. Multiple domain (range) 
>>> expressions restrict the domain (range) of
>>> a property to the intersection of the class expressions."
>>>
>>> Suggest having a reference to domain/range definition for those that 
>>> are not familiar with these terms.
>>>   
>>
>> I was actually surprised to see the above comment in this document as 
>> it is a fairly esoteric point.  It may be important to how the 
>> Profile was implemented,
>> but if not, I would suggest removing it entirely.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>  
>>
>>> Line 522:
>>>
>>> regrep:AssociationType:Property =>  regrep:AssociationType:HasProperty
>>>
>>> This is more consistent with existing assoc types (+) but does not 
>>> preserve the OWL element name exactly (-).
>>> If we do above change then we may want to suggest adding above to 
>>> canonical AssociationType scheme as it is fairly generic.
>>>   
>>
>> I would strongly advise against this change.  Properties are first 
>> class elements in RDFS and OWL. What is it that "has" the Property 
>> above - an ontology?  If at all possible, please use the OWL, RDFS 
>> and RDF terms verbatim.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>  
>>
>>> Line 613:
>>>
>>> "OWL-S Profile"
>>>
>>> => Suggest using namespace prefix and have a table of all namespace 
>>> prefixes somewhere in Intro to OWL chapter
>>>
>>> "owls:Profile"
>>>   
>>
>> References to OWL-S would not belong in an OWL chapter since OWL-S is 
>> not
>> part of the OWL language, but rather a source of OWL ontologies used in
>> examples in the Profile document.
>>
>> -Evan
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh