Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: Ballot: update spec
Lisa,
I vote AGREE with the following assumption:
Association and Classification (which is a subclass of Association),
being UML association classes, are not required to support UUID or
to support further association/classification.
Regards, Dan
e-business Data Technology and Standard
IBM Silicon Valley Laboratory
Notes: Dan Chang/Santa Teresa/IBM@IBMUS
Internet:
VM: IBMUSM50(DTCHANG)
Phone: (408)-463-2319
Lisa Carnahan
<lisa.carnahan To:
@nist.gov> cc:
Subject: Ballot: update spec
08/14/01 01:09
PM
Ballot: Update RIM based on "Gallagher, Najmi, Stojanovic Proposal"
Statement: " The RIM and RS should be updated to reflect (only) the
proposed changes to Figures 1 and 2 of the RIM and all relevant text. The
"Gallagher, Najmi, Stojanovic Proposal" is considered to be (1) the 2
figures emailed to the TC and (2) the single email message describing the
changes (sent by Najmi to the TC). All changes to the specifications made
as a result of this ballot will be highlighted in the
specifications. Passage of this ballot does not imply that the proposed
changes are agreed to by the TC. A separate ballot will be issued to
approve/disapprove the changes."
Agree or disagree
You don't need to respond with your ballot to the whole list, you may
respond to me at .
--lisa
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to:
Next in thread →
Next in month →