<Quote>
It is a shorter XML instance document.
</Quote>
Uh...I think I already knew that. But thanks anyway. ;)
I should explain further why I posed that question specifically to
Peter: I was at the demo that he references, and (unless it happened
while I was on a sidebar with someone) I do not recall any aspect of
that demo covering anything less than a complete XML schema. So I
thought that perhaps he had a different interpretation of the term "XML
fragment" than the norm.
Joe
Duane Nickull wrote:
>
> Too late. There was a huge debate on this subject in the late 1990's
> about what an XML fragment is. Becuase XML does not have any semantics
> associated with it, as long as it is either valid or well-formed, it is
> in indistinguish-able from another XML instance. It is a shorter XML
> instance document.
>
> Duane
>
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>
> ><Quote>
> >When designing a PDF/XML form, the designer would search the registry
> >for various fragments
> ></Quote>
> >
> >Please define a "fragment" in terms of both XML and an electronic form.
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> ***************************************************
> Yellow Dragon Software - http://www.yellowdragonsoft.com
> Web Services & ebXML Messaging / Registry Downloads
> Project Team Lead - UN/CEFACT eBusiness Architecture
> Phone: +1 (604) 738-1051 - Canada: Pacific Standard Time
> Direct: +1 (604) 726-3329
