Why am I getting a 1999 flashback here? :)
Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Booz Allen Hamilton
Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Duane Nickull [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 4:50 PM
> To: Anders W. Tell
> Cc: ebXML Regrep (ebXML Regrep)
> Subject: Re: [regrep] Final draft recommendations for CC's
> and Registry - UML/UMM Profile for CCTS
>
> Anders:
>
> Sure - XMI probably is the best choice we have for model a
> interchange format, but it is a lot larger than a comparable
> binary file would be for storing persistent information about
> the same model. If you used XMI exclusively, it would take
> up a lot more space on your users machines and take a lot
> longer to parse, load.
>
> I think most of the UML tool vendors have it right -> they
> use binary files and allow the users the chance to build and
> export XMI renditions.
>
> Duane
>
> Anders W. Tell wrote:
>
> > Duane Nickull wrote:
> >
> >> XMI would be notoriously innefficient as a storage
> mechanism for UML
> >> projects.
> >
> >
> > Could you elaborate on this ? Most UML tools use XMI based
> formats so
> > it must be usable. What are your concerns?
> >
> > /anders
> >
>
> --
> ***********
> Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. -
> http://www.adobe.com
> Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
> Chair - OASIS eb SOA TC -
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ebsoa
> ***********
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from
> the roster of the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/le
> ave_workgroup.php.
>
>
