Farrukh,
I feel that you are rushing this too much. You need to give some of us
a breather to go back and make comments and make thoughtful suggestions.
I have not attended any of these review telecons because I felt that the
process was being pushed way too hard. You need to give reasonable time
for those of us who are not full time on this standard. I understand
that you are anxious to move to the next release, however, I am much
more interested in seeing a slow and stable release cycle with extremely
well reviewed products at each release.
-Matt
Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> Dear TC members,
>
> I have been educating myself on the OASIS Standards Approval Process [1].
>
> I learned a few relevant an interesting points undre the current rules:
>
> 1. A TC *CAN* give TC Approved status to a spec by voice vote in a TC
> telecon meeting. This can be done either by
>
> (a) roll call or
> (b) voice vote ("all those in favor..." etc.)
>
> followed by chair indicating his/her judgment that numbers were met
> (sufficient "yes"s, and no more "nos" than rule permits)
> at which time members can accept that judgment or challenge the
> conclusion (by asking for a roll call).
>
> 2. The same voting process is allowed for the vote to send a TC
> APproved spec for public review.
>
> 3. Neither vote requires a electronic ballot or a 2 week period.
>
> 4. The current process allows the "TC Approval" vote and the "Send to
> Public Review" vote to occur in the same TC telecon meeting.
>
> I have already validated my interpretation of [1] with my colleague
> Eduardo Gutentag <> to make sure I did not
> misunderstand anything.
>
> Being a pathelogical optmist I would like to propose that we make
> every effort to have a very high turnout of TC members for tomorrow's
> meeting so that we can have everyone's vote count if we choose to have
> one or both votes tomorrow. Please do your best to attend and attend
> on time. Thanks.
>
> [1] Standards Approval Process
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#standards_approval
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: Question on spec approval process
> From:
> James Bryce Clark <>
> Date:
> Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:26:41 -0800
> To:
> Farrukh Najmi <>
>
> To:
> Farrukh Najmi <>
>
>
> Responses below. Best regards JBC
>
> At 02:43 PM 2/2/2005, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>
>> Hi Jamie,
>> As I a sure you are already aware, the ebXML Registry 3.0 specs are
>> nearing Committee Draft status.
>> I have the following question on the standards approval process [1]
>> -Can a TC give TC Approved status to a spec by voice vote in a TC
>> telecon meeting (assuming necessary votes were met and duly recorded
>> in TC meeting minutes) ?
>
>
> Under current rules, yes. If unanimous, minutes should say so and
> note attendance. If not, minutes should clearly reflect that the
> necessary minimums were met. This can be done either by (a) roll call
> or (b) voice vote ("all those in favor..." etc.) followed by chair
> indicating his/her judgment that numbers were met (sufficient "yes"s,
> and no more "nos" than rule permits) -- at which time members can
> accept that judgment or challenge the conclusion (by asking for a roll
> call).
>
>> - Once a spec is TC approved, can a TC decide to submit it for public
>> review by voice vote in a TC telecon meeting (assuming necessary
>> votes were met and duly recorded in TC meeting minutes) ?
>
>
> Yes.
>
>> - Can the TC Approval vote, and the vote to send TC approved spec to
>> public review, be conducted by 2 separate voice votes in the same TC
>> telecon meeting ?
>
>
> Yes.
>
>> My apologies in advance if some of these questions are covered by [1]
>> already. If not you may consider clarifying in a future version.
>> Thanks very much for your help.
>> [1] Standards Approval Process
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#standards_approval
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Farrukh
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
