Carl Mattocks wrote:
>I proffer 'ebXML Registry: Content Profile Development Guide'
>
>
Not bad. The only issue I see is that the fussy among us may feel that
it discriminates against meta data
but I could go with above. What do other colleagues think?
>
><quote who="Farrukh Najmi">
>
>
>>BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>What is the better title for the *tutorial* technical note?
>>>
>>>after the yesterday meeting we have proposed something like:
>>>"ebXML Registry Profile Development Guide"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Only issue is that the profile developed for XXX is called the XXX
>>Profuile for ebXML Registry.
>>
>>So the more accurate title may be: "Guide to Developing Profiles for
>>ebXMl Registry"
>>
>>Another possibility is: "ebXML Registry: Profile Development Guide"
>>
>>Actually I like the last one best.
>>
>>
>>
>>>So please if someone of you has a better suggestion or some negative
>>>point for the new title, speak up now :)
>>>
>>>Many thanks,
>>>Ivan
>>>
>>>Ivan Bedini
>>>R&D Engineer
>>>France Telecom R&D
>>>
>>>Le jeudi 28 avril 2005 à 15:46 +0200, BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>in attachment you will find a *first* update of the ebXML Registry
>>>>tutorial.
>>>>While now only minor changes have been done:
>>>> * changed the format document
>>>> * revision about conformance to the v 3.0 of RR specs
>>>>
>>>>Please feel free to review the document.
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
