RE: [regrep] [Before Sending Out Ballot - Please Note!] RE: [regrep] draft of ballot to come

From
Chiusano Joseph <>
Date
2005-04-01T18:12:41+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [regrep] [Before Sending Out Ballot - Please Note!] RE: [regrep] draft of ballot to come
Title: RE: [regrep] [Before Sending Out Ballot - Please Note!] RE: [regrep] draft of ballot to come

Whoa...chill Peter.:) I'm 
sure it was an honest oversight by someone in OASIS staff. I'm sure you've never 
made that same mistake...;)

 

Joe

From: Peter Kacandes 
[mailto:]
Sent: Fri 4/1/2005 12:50 PM
To: 
'James Bryce Clark'; 
Subject: RE: [regrep] 
[Before Sending Out Ballot - Please Note!] RE: [regrep] draft of ballot to 
come

What?!

Why are we submitting anything about 
UDDI?

Did somebody not cut and paste correctly?

Better do a better 
job of proof-reading first.

pk

-----Original Message-----
From: 
Chiusano Joseph [mailto:]
Sent: 
Friday, April 01, 2005 3:51 AM
To: James Bryce Clark; 

Subject: [regrep] [Before Sending Out Ballot - 
Please Note!] RE: [regrep]
draft of ballot to 
come

Jamie,

Wanted to call your attention to this prior to sending 
OASIS-wide - Please
note the unintentionally embedded additional text in the 
paragraph below:

<Quote>
The OASIS ebXML Registry TC has 
submitted the ebXML Registry Information
Model (RIM) v3.0 and ebMXL Registy 
sndUniversal Description, Discovery &
Integration (UDDI) specification 
v3.0.2, an approved Committee Draft, to be
considered as an OASIS Standard. 
The TC's submission is attached 
below.
</Quote>

Joe

Joseph Chiusano
Booz Allen 
Hamilton
Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com

> 
-----Original Message-----
> From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:]
> 
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 7:06 PM
> To: 

> Subject: [regrep] draft of ballot to 
come
>
>
>      FYI, here's what I 
plan to post tomorrow afternoon to formally
> launch the OASIS Standard 
vote.  Best regards JBC
>
> ====
> DRAFT (for posting 1 
April)
>
> Subject: ebXML Registry specifications submitted for 
OASIS Standard
> From: James Bryce Clark 
<>
> To: 
,
> Date: [1 
April]
>
> OASIS members:
>
> The OASIS ebXML Registry 
TC has submitted the ebXML Registry
> Information Model (RIM) v3.0 and 
ebMXL Registy sndUniversal
> Description, Discovery & Integration 
(UDDI) specification v3.0.2, an
> approved Committee Draft, to be 
considered as an OASIS Standard. The
> TC's submission is attached 
below.
>
> In accordance with the OASIS Technical Committee Process, 
the
> specification has already gone through a 30 day public review 
period.
> (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200502/msg00
> 
008.html)
> OASIS members now have until the 15th of April to 
familiarize
> themselves with the submission below. OASIS members should 
give their
> input on this question to the voting representative of 
their
> organization.
>
> By the 16th of the month we will 
send out a Call For Vote to the
> voting representatives of the OASIS 
member organizations, who will
> have until the end of the month to cast 
their ballots on whether this
> Committee Draft should be approved as an 
OASIS Standard.
>
> The normative TC Process for approval of 
Committee Drafts as OASIS
> Standards is found at
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#standard
>
> 
Any statements related to the IPR of this specification are posted at
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/ipr.php
>
> 
~ James Bryce Clark
> ~ Director, Standards Development, OASIS ~ +1 978 
667 5115 x
> 203 central offiice
>
> >Submission for OASIS 
Membership Vote:
> >
> >1. A formal specification that is a 
valid member of its
> type, together
> >with appropriate 
documentation for the specification, both of which
> >must be written 
using approved OASIS templates.
> >     A zip file 
with both specifications and related files
> is publicly
> 
>available from
> >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=12049
> 
>
> >The zip file contains:
> >1. The OASIS ebXML Registry 
Information Model (RIM)
> specification, v3.0
> >as 
"regrep-rim-3.0-cs-02.pdf".
> >2. The OASIS ebXML Registry Services 
(RS) specification, v3.0 as
> >"regrep-rs-3.0-cs-02.pdf".
> 
>3. Supporting files and documentation including:
> 
>     a. 10 WSDL description files
> 
>     b. 21 XML scheme files
> 
>     c. 5 XSD files
> >
> >The 
individual approved Committee Draft specifications in PDF format
> 
>(same as in zip files) are publicly available from the ebXML
> 
Registry TC site.
> >
> >OASIS ebXML Registry Services and 
Protocols version 3.0
> Committee Draft:
> >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12060/regre
> 
p-rs-3.0-c
> >d-02.pdf
> >
> >OASIS ebXML Registry 
Information Model version 3.0 Committee Draft:
> >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12061/regre
> 
p-rim-3.0-
> >cd-02.pdf
> >
> >2. A clear 
English-language summary of the specification:
> >
> >The 
ebXML Registry provides a stable store where submitted
> content 
and
> >the metadata used to describe that content is managed and 
is
> made persistent.
> >Such information is used to facilitate 
business to business
> >relationships and transactions. In the business 
to business context,
> >submitted content includes but is not limited 
to XML schema and
> >documents, process descriptions, ebXML Core 
Components, context
> >descriptions, UML models, information about 
organizations,
> and software
> >components. An ebXML Registry is 
capable of storing any type of
> >electronic content including XML 
documents, text, images, or sound.
> >Metadata is used to describe the 
stored content and is
> defined in the
> >Registry Information 
Model (RIM). Submitted content may be stored in
> >the content 
repository provided by the ebXML Registry. The
> interface to
> 
>the Registry is defined in the Registry Services and
> Protocols (RS) 
document.
> >It provides a set of services that enable sharing of 
content and
> >metadata between organizations.  The RS defines the 
services
> provided
> >by an ebXML Registry and the protocols 
used by clients to
> interact with these services.
> >The version 
2.0 RIM and RS specifications were approved as OASIS
> >Standards in 
May 2002, and ISO approved them as ISO 15000 part 3 and
> >part 4 
standards in March 2004. Version 3.0 of RIM and RS add
> >considerable 
functionality over version 2.0.  New functionality
> >available in 
version 3.0 include registry federation and federated
> >queries, which 
enable clients to discover information stored
> in any of
> 
>multiple federated registries through one search. To meet
> the needs 
for
> >security in a federated environment, version 3.0 utilizes the 
OASIS
> >SAML 2.0 specifications for identity management, 
authentication and
> >single sign on across the members. The OASIS 
XACML 1.0 standard is
> >leveraged to provide access control policies 
and OASIS WSS
> SOAP Message
> >Security 1.0 is used to secure 
the registry's SOAP protocol
> using digital certificates.
> 
>Extensible service interfaces and protocols are defined in
> version 
3.0
> >as plugins to an ebXML Registry that provide content 
cataloging
> >services and content validation services.  The 
version 3.0 also
> >provides managed version control through the 
registry.  A new HTTP
> >binding to the ebXML Registry Services 
interfaces is defined
> using a REST style architecture.
> >This 
enables any content or meta data in the registry to be
> 
accessible
> >over an HTTP URL using a standard web browser.  
A
> Parameterized Stored
> >Query feature allows a complex query 
to be stored in the registry in
> >parameterized form. To invoke the 
query, the client provides some or
> >all of the query parameters, 
usually using a web form to fill in the
> >parameters and submit the 
query. Other query improvements include
> >iterative queries, content 
based queries, and improved
> filter query syntax.
> >In version 
3.0 subscriptions may be created by the user for
> >content-based event 
notification of specific events of interest.
> >Notification is sent to 
a web service or an email address. 
> Additional
> >new 
features include extensibility of registry protocol for defining
> >new 
types of requests and responses, incorporation of user defined
> 
>domain specific taxonomies, and the ability to group related content
> 
>artifacts in packages.
> >
> >3. a statement regarding the 
relationship of this specification to
> >similar work of other OASIS 
TCs or other standards
> developing organizations:
> 
>      The OASIS ebXML Registry 3.0 specifications 
are
> aligned with a
> >variety of OASIS and other standards as 
described below.
> >*       The OASIS Web 
Services Security: SOAP Message Security 1.0
> >specification is used 
to provide Message Security for the
> Registry protocol.
> 
>*       The OASIS Web Services Security: SOAP 
Message with
> Attachments
> >(SwA) Profile 1.0 specification is 
used to provide Message
> Security for
> >SOAP attachments within 
the Registry protocol.
> >*       The 
OASIS XACML 1.0 specification is used to define
> the syntax for
> 
>registry Access Control Policies.
> 
>*       The OASIS SAML 2.0 specifications are 
used to
> support Federated
> >Identity Management and Single 
Sign On within the registry.
> >*       
The registry conforms to the WS-I: Basic Profile 1.1
> for SOAP 
and
> >WSDL conformance.
> 
>*       The registry conforms to the WS-I: 
Attachments
> Profile 1.0 for
> >SOAP with Attachments 
conformance.
> >Limited similarities exist between the OASIS ebXML 
Registry 3.0 and
> >OASIS UDDI 3.0. Both specifications define a 
registry for
> web services
> >and a registry exposed as a web 
service. UDDI 3.0 specifies
> a registry
> >only, while ebXML 
Registry 3.0 specifies both a registry and a
> >repository. No explicit 
dependencies exist between those two
> OASIS specification 
efforts.
> >
> >4. Certification by at least three OASIS 
member
> organizations that they
> >are successfully using the 
specifications consistently with
> the OASIS
> >IPR
> 
>Policy:
> >     a. ebXMLsoft Inc. has been 
successfully using the ebXML
> Registry
> >3.0  
specifications consistently with the OASIS IPR Policy.
> ebXMLsoft
> 
>considers the ebXML Registry 3.0 specifications an important
> 
>continuation  to delivering functionality necessary to further
> 
>accommodate its ebXML  Federated Enterprise Reference 
Architecture
> >(eFERA).  See
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200502/msg00056.html
> 
>     b. Sun Microsystems Inc. has been successfully 
using the ebXML
> >Registry 3.0 specifications as approved by the OASIS 
ebXML Registry
> >Technical Committee. Sun Microsystems Inc. considers 
that the ebXML
> >Registry 3.0 specifications are ready to be submitted 
and
> accepted as
> >an  OASIS Standard in accordance with 
the OASIS IPR Policy. See
> >http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200502/msg00054.html
> 
>     c. Adobe Systems Incorporated has been successfully 
using the
> >ebXML  Registry 3.0 specifications as approved by the 
OASIS ebXML
> >Registry  Technical Committee. See
> >http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200502/msg00059.html.
> 
>
> >5. An account of each of the comments/issues raised 
during
> the public
> >review period, along with its 
resolution:
> >     Available from
> 
>
> >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/11865/regre
> 
p-3.0-comm
> >ents.html
> >
> >6. An account of and 
results of the voting to approve the
> specification
> >as a 
Committee Draft:
> >     Vote to affirm approval of 
the specifications as
> Committee Drafts
> >documented in the 
meeting minutes for March 15, 2005:
> >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/regrep/minutes/minutes-0
> 
3-15-05.pd
> >f
> >
> >7. An account of or pointer to 
votes and comments received in any
> >earlier attempts to standardize 
substantially the same
> specification,
> >together with the 
originating TC's response to each comment:
> >     
These specifications have not previously been submitted
> to OASIS
> 
>for  approval as standards.
> >
> >8. A pointer to 
the publicly visible comments archive for
> the originating TC:
> 
>     http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep-comment/
> 
>
> >9. A statement from the chair of the TC certifying that 
all
> members of
> >the TC have been provided with a copy of the 
OASIS IPR Policy:
> >     I have provided all ebXML 
Registry TC members with the
> link to the
> >OASIS IPR 
Policy.  See
> >http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200503/msg00018.html
> 
>
> >10. Optionally, a pointer to any minority reports 
submitted
> by one or
> >more TC members who did not vote in 
favor of approving the Committee
> >Draft, or certification by the 
chair that no minority reports exist.
> >     There 
are no minority reports submitted by any TC
> members related
> 
>to  the ebXML Registry specs.  Both the ebXML RS and the ebXML 
RIM
> >specifications were approved as Committee Drafts 
unanimously.
> >
> >Kathryn Breininger
> >OASIS ebXML 
Registry TC Chair
>
> DRAFT ENDS
>
> Note, I deleted 
several additional "use certifications" from parties
> who are not 
organizational members of OASIS and thus, while welcome as
> implementers, 
do not count towards the rule's minimum quota.
>
> Regards 
JBC
>
>
>
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To 
unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> 
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs 
in
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr
> 
oups.php
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To 
unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates 
this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in 
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To 
unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates 
this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in 
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php