At 01:52 PM 2005-06-23, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>Miko Matsumura wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>Interesting declaration from the UDDI TC chair to the dev email list
>>concerning the future of UDDI/ebXML Reg Rep coexistence solutions. Thoughts?
>>Miko
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> *From:* Luc Clement [mailto:]
>> *Sent:* Thu 6/23/2005 3:37 AM
>> *To:* 'Governor James'; 'Jørgen Thyme';
>> *Cc:*
>> *Subject:* RE: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons
>>
>> “likely to follow” is entirely speculative on your part. Let me be
>> equally speculative: “no others will”.
>“likely to follow” is speculative which is a fine thing to so.
>“no others will” is an assertion with no facts to back it up. Sounds
>like an emotional "knee-jerk" and defensive reaction to me.
>
>Unusual behavior for a TC chair I must admit.
Perhaps another knee-jerk ...
I think both statements are opinion with no facts to back up either statement.
I don't understand why you don't think Luc's comment is just as speculative
as the other.
And James did say "feel free to flame me" in that thread.
Paul
