Re: [saml-dev] Con Call Tuesday 4/23

From
Don Bowen <>
Date
2002-04-20T19:01:05+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [saml-dev] Con Call Tuesday 4/23
Duly noted! We won't consider anyone that doesn't make the call
as being uninterested. I just don't want to reserve too many more lines
than we need. Thanks for letting us know.

Don;

"Flinn, Don" wrote:
Don

I'm going to be at the XACML F2F in Milan on the 23th.  I'll try
to call

in but if I can't make the call please don't count me as not interested.

Don

        -----Original Message-----

        From: Don Bowen

        Sent: Fri 4/19/2002 11:26
PM

        To: 

        Cc:

        Subject: [saml-dev] Con
Call Tuesday 4/23

 

 

        I will plan to setup a conference
call for Tuesday 4/23 from

        12-1pm EDT.

        My apologies for not sending
this out sooner. We should have

        an agenda and further identify
things that are best

        accomplished over the phone.
Obviously we need to have that

        agenda somewhat firmed up
by late Monday, which doesn't give

        us much time, possibly only
Monday (unless some of you are

        as bad as I am about work).

        I would first like to know
who will be participating, so

        that I can make sure I have
enough lines. I will assume one

        line per confirmed company,
unless I hear otherwise. I know

        Sun will have at least two
lines unless Ping has a trip

        scheduled to Peoria, IL
that I don't know about :-)

        Here are a few items for
the agenda

        - Final naming of the event,
but as it stands it is: SAML

        Interop 2002

        - Early testing

          - How soon will
you be ready to test? What will be ready?

          - Proximity
might determine a lot here

        - Discuss dry run locations,
times and participants

          - RSA has already
offered their facilities for a dry-run

        on the east coast

          - Sun may be
able to do the same for the west cost

          - We need to
know who would go where and what times will

        work

        - Discuss the technical
focus

          - We have agreed
that browser artifact is at least one

        aspect of the demo

          - If we are
going to do anything with authz decision

        assertions we will need
a clear proposal and I think all of

        us would like to see this
happen

          - We won't want
to deep end on this topic on the phone,

        but if we can agree about
who will do what and keep to Hal's

        proposed 5/15 deadline that
should be good

        - Discuss Catalyst

          - Who can come
early?

          - When do we
think we need to arrive?

          - Can we limit
the amount of network gear being shipped or

        carried?

          - Signage?

          - How should
we get the marketing people talking?

          - Script can
probably wait until after 5/15 when the

        technical focus is firm

        These are very much off the
top of my head and I'm sure

        there are other topics.
Hal, I don't know who moderates the

        calls normally, but that
person is welcome to do the same on

        this one. If I don't see
that happening I'm going to do it.

        Does OASIS has someone participate?
Are they lurking here

        and will they tell us that
they will join in?

        Don;

 

  ------------------------------------------------------------

                 
Name: winmail.dat

   winmail.dat    Type: application/ms-tnef

             
Encoding: base64

Attachment:
don.bowen.vcf

Description: Card for Don Bowen