Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [saml-dev] Con Call Tuesday 4/23
Hi
All
Hitachi/Quadrasis' main interest is in using SAML for the mid-tier.
This is driven by our customer's needs. We propose that we will pick up
from where the browser profile leaves off at an IIS Web Server, send a SAML
assertion to a 6.1 WebLogic Server, verify the signature on the assertion,
authorize a "good" user to one EJB bean and reject a "bad" user to another bean,
and return the assertion in a cookie, which can be use for subsequent
calls.
We
have these demo cases working with our product, so I believe the
integration with the browser profile will not be too hard.
This
demo shows interoperability between Microsoft Windows and EJB using SAML.
It also extends SAML to the mid-tier. This demo has gotten rave reviews
from our customers and prospects -:)
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Bowen
[mailto:]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 2:59
PM
To: Flinn, Don
Cc:
Subject: Re: [saml-dev] Con Call
Tuesday 4/23
Duly noted! We won't consider anyone
that doesn't make the call as being uninterested. I just don't want to reserve
too many more lines than we need. Thanks for letting us know.
Don;
"Flinn, Don" wrote:
Don
I'm going to be at the XACML F2F in Milan on the 23th. I'll try to
call
in but if I can't make the call please don't count me as not
interested.
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Bowen
Sent: Fri 4/19/2002 11:26 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: [saml-dev] Con
Call Tuesday 4/23
I will plan to setup a
conference call for Tuesday 4/23 from
12-1pm EDT.
My apologies for not sending
this out sooner. We should have
an agenda and further
identify things that are best
accomplished over the phone. Obviously we need to have that
agenda somewhat firmed up by
late Monday, which doesn't give
us much time, possibly only
Monday (unless some of you are
as bad as I am about work).
I would first like to know who
will be participating, so
that I can make sure I have enough lines. I will assume one
line per confirmed company,
unless I hear otherwise. I know
Sun will have at least two
lines unless Ping has a trip
scheduled to Peoria, IL that I don't know about :-)
Here are a few items for the
agenda
- Final naming of the
event, but as it stands it is: SAML
Interop 2002
- Early testing
- How soon will
you be ready to test? What will be ready?
- Proximity might
determine a lot here
-
Discuss dry run locations, times and participants
- RSA has already
offered their facilities for a dry-run
on the east coast
- Sun may be able
to do the same for the west cost
- We need to know
who would go where and what times will
work
- Discuss the technical focus
- We have agreed
that browser artifact is at least one
aspect of the demo
- If we are going
to do anything with authz decision
assertions we will need a
clear proposal and I think all of
us would like to see this
happen
- We won't
want to deep end on this topic on the phone,
but if we can agree about who
will do what and keep to Hal's
proposed 5/15 deadline that
should be good
- Discuss
Catalyst
- Who
can come early?
-
When do we think we need to arrive?
- Can we limit
the amount of network gear being shipped or
carried?
- Signage?
- How should we
get the marketing people talking?
- Script can
probably wait until after 5/15 when the
technical focus is firm
These are very much off the
top of my head and I'm sure
there are other topics. Hal, I don't know who moderates the
calls normally, but that
person is welcome to do the same on
this one. If I don't see that
happening I'm going to do it.
Does OASIS has someone participate? Are they lurking here
and will they tell us that
they will join in?
Don;
------------------------------------------------------------
Name: winmail.dat
winmail.dat Type:
application/ms-tnef
Encoding: base64
Next in thread →
Next in month →