I
believe everybody doing browser/artifact source is also doing
destination.
Hal
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Bowen
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:47
PM
To: Hal Lockhart
Cc:
Subject: Re: [saml-dev] Promised
Participant Spreadsheet
Hal,
Good suggestion. Here is the new spreadsheet. Please let me know if
something needs changed. And if anyone knows how to fix the grid lines I could
use help. I've tried borders under formatting, but it didn't help.
I did this right away, but got more info from my people and also found out
that Cisco is definitely not going to participate.
Don;
Hal Lockhart wrote:
It might be worth adding a column to indicate
browser/artifact source (portal) vs. destination (application). There is an
analogous distinction between Producer (PDP) and Consumer (PEP) for the
AuthZDecAssn as well.
According to my notes, Crosslogix, Quadrisis, Sigaba and
Systinet plan to be Destination only. Baltimore, Entegrity, Netegrity,
Oblix, RSA, Sun and Tivoli plan to implement both Source and Destination.
Cisco, Novell and Verisign are uncertain or unknown.
With respect to AuthZDecAssn, I am under the impression
that Crosslogix and Sun intend to be both Producer and Consumer (is this
correct?) whereas at Entegrity, while we are integrating a Producer into our
product, our consumer will be in the nature of a test frame and we will
probably not publically demonstrate it.
The reason for capturing this detail at this early date, is
that it directly impacts the size to the test matrix and thus the amount of
time required for testing.
Hal
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Bowen [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:20 AM
> To:
> Subject: [saml-dev] Promised Participant Spreadsheet
>
>
> I have attached the promised SAML Interop 2002
Participant
> spreadsheet, summarizing what we
discussed in our con call
> and much of what Dee
put in the minutes.
>
> Please check the information to make sure that it is
> correct. Let me know if there is information to add
and I
> will repost. If there is additional
information that we
> should add, just let me
know.
>
> I have
contacted Cisco, Systinet and Verisign. No response
> yet from Cisco or Verisign, but Anne Thomas Manes has
> already replied and her information is reflected in
the
> spreadsheet.
>
> I will be out of the country
starting Monday and have
> limited access to
email (I think). However, Ping will be
>
monitoring the list for Sun while I'm gone. We should have
> an answer very soon confirming use of our facilities for
the
> west coast dry run the week of
6/17.
>
> Prateek we
still need you to repost the proposed scenario
>
for the technical focus. We only have a short time left
> before our self-imposed deadline of 5/15 and probably
have
> much more to discuss. If you have
questions or proposals of
> your own, now is the
time to speak up :-)
>
> We also need each vendor to send in the description of
the
> application(s) they will be providing for
the demo.
>
> Thanks
everybody!
>
>
Don;
>
