Re: Fw: [saml-dev] Question about the base64 encoding in Browser/POST profile

From
David Walker <>
Date
2003-03-19T13:43:05+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: Fw: [saml-dev] Question about the base64 encoding in Browser/POST profile
How would you specify the encoding of the decoded B64?  When you unpack the B64 it could be anything from UTF8 to binary, couldn't it? or is this even necessary?

-d
-------Original Message-------
From: Abe Kang <>
Sent: 03/19/03 12:12 AM
To: 
Subject: Fw: [saml-dev] Question about the base64 encoding in Browser/POST profile

> 
> 


 Hi Scott,

    If you look at the output of BASE64 encoding, the only characters
present
 are ASCII characters so the encoding doesn't matter.  All of the major
 encoding standards (UTF8, ISO859-x, CP125x overlap in their mapping of
ASCII
 characters.

    The thing you have to be careful of is the different encoding of HTML
 that is used between asserting and relying parties.

--Abraham
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Scott Cantor" <>
> To: "'Abe Kang'" <>;
> <>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 5:49 AM
> Subject: RE: [saml-dev] Question about the base64 encoding in
Browser/POST
> profile
>
>
> > > The encoding of HTML pages between two parties needs to be
> > > specified before any data is transfered betwen them.  The
> > > encoding of HTML pages is determined at the server.
> >
> > That's the part I do understand. ;-)
> >
> > The questions I have are about base64 and whether any of that is
affected
> by character encoding. I believe that's the question that
> > was raised.
> >
> > -- Scott
> >
>

>