> ID-WSF for the web service invocations
What do you mean here ? Also there are interoperability issues here between SAML (1.0, 1.1, 1.2) and the various Liberty specifications. I would agree that SAML 2.0 should split off the SSO from identity federation.
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Conor P. Cahill" <>
"Conor P. Cahill" <>
11/09/2004 05:45 AM
To
Jean-No螔 Colin <>
cc
"Simon James" <>, "Reid, Irving" <>, "Kapil Sachdeva" <>, , "Beach, Michael C" <>, "Scott Cantor" <>
Subject
Re: [saml-dev] Which version to use?
Jean-No螔 Colin wrote on 11/9/2004, 3:11 AM:
>
> But what about ID-WSF, which in our case, would be the way to go, as
> all communication between application components will be web-service
> based?
I would use SAML 2.0 for identity federation and SSO and I would use
ID-WSF for the web service invocations. At this point there is not
a released spec that shows how SAML 2.0 should be integrated into
ID-WSF, but as SAML 2.0 nears completion/approval, I would bet that
you will see such information being published.
Conor
