thanks for putting this out there, scott:
https://authdev.it.ohio-state.edu/twiki/bin/view/Shibboleth/ShibPortals
draft-cantor-saml-sso-delegation-01.pdf is very well-written. it
addresses pretty much exactly what this thread discusses. couple
questions, please?
1) off the top of your head, can you think of any obstacles that
might turn up if a saml 1.1 implementation is tailored to use a
similar approach as what you describe in
draft-cantor-saml-sso-delegation-01.pdf for saml 2.0?
2) what are the likely next steps (time lines?) re the oasis
life-cycle of the draft?
many thanks,
will
--
