On 2/9/07, Scott Cantor <> wrote:
>
> I think it's past time to just define an AuthnRequest Extension to allow for
> tunnelling Attributes to use as a query though. If I'd known that POST was
> going to be so accepted as a binding for SSO requests, I'd probably just
> have included it in the schema anyway. I just didn't think it would fit well
> in a Redirect.
Well, the RequestAbstractType already has an extension point, so the
Attribute elements could be added today without additional schema,
right? Are you saying that some profile work is needed to insure
interoperable AuthnRequest/AttributeQuery combinations? That would be
great!
Tom
