RE: [saml-dev] Minor inconsistency in SAML 2 spec?

> For the record, some people have complicated definitions of 
> it, mine was minimal, it's whoever tries to give an assertion 
> to a relying party in order to accomplish something. The Core 
> definition is worded passively in a tautological way, which 
> is not real helpful.

I understand; thanks for the clarification.

josh.