← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [saml-dev] Réf. : [saml-dev] Re: Réf. : Re: [saml-dev] Réf. : RE: [saml-dev] AttributeQuery : why SOAP binding ?
Scott, given Valérie's requirements, what do you think about a front-channel binding for an attribute query request? Scott Cantor wrote: >> We have exactly the same requirement for "dynamically" obtaining > information >> from an IdP with user consent at the IdP here in New Zealand. > > I don't see how it's the same if your problem can be solved at > authentication time and theirs apparently can't. I agree with Valerie that > if the requirement is to ask for information after login, it's silly to > artificially perform another authentication to get the information. > >> I believe that submissions are currently in progress to the SAML 2 > technical >> expert committee for a mechanism within the specification to permit the >> dynamic requesting of information within the <AuthnRequest>. I am not > aware >> of any timeframe or the whether the submissions will be accepted, but I > hope >> this helps. > > There's no timeframe because the person that offered to draft something > hasn't done so. There is no submission that uses the required conventions > and follows the norms that would be acceptable in an approved extension. > >> Other potential options (but not really recommended) could involve >> specifying the required attributes as a String in the >> <RequestedAuthnContext>. > > Obviously, that doesn't make much sense. We have an extension point, that's > what you need to use if you develop something yourself. > >> The AttributeConsumerServiceIndex is another >> option, but is a fairly indirect mechanism. > > It's no different than using a WS-SecurityPolicy document with Cardspace. > >> As a last resort you could >> consider the use of SAML <Extensions> in the <AuthnRequest>, but I don't >> know if that would suit your model either? > > I'm not sure if you're clear on this, but if something "official" gets > drafted, that's what it will be. There is no other place to do it (within an > AuthnRequest). > > But Valerie's problem is different, and I would agree that using a query > through the browser probably makes more sense. > > -- Scott > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail: > -- SWITCH Serving Swiss Universities -------------------------- Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Net Services Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68 , http://www.switch.ch
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →