RE: [saml-dev] Digital Signature Usage in X.509 Subject Attribute Query Specifications

From: Scott Cantor <>
Date: 2009-04-08T18:28:48+00:00
ID: 05d601c9b877$d99290d0$8cb7b270$@
Thread: RE: [saml-dev] Digital Signature Usage in X.509 Subject Attribute Query Specifications

Anil John wrote on 2009-04-08:
> Any insights to share regarding the MUST vs. MAY usage of signing of
> the parts of the response in the two specs?

No memory of them whatsoever. I see X.509 and stop paying attention.

-- Scott

View original preserved HTML →

← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Next in thread → Next in month →