RE: [saml-dev] phishing the DS protocol

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2010-10-18T16:06:36+00:00
ID
[email protected]
Thread
RE: [saml-dev] phishing the DS protocol
> The Identity Provider Discovery Service Protocol and Profile talks
> about the dangers of phishing attacks and how metadata can mitigate
> this threat. However, it stops short of specifying that the DS MUST
> ensure by some means (metadata or otherwise) that the location
> specified in the return parameter is in fact associated with the
> requester given by the entityID parameter. Am I missing something?

Not that I can see. Making it a MUST doesn't give anybody involved any
guarantee that it's being prevented, so it's not a MUST, just up to the
implementer/deployer.

Could have been a "MUST implement", didn't really think about it.
 
-- Scott