Re: [saml-dev] OneTimeUse Clarification

Thank you for enlightening answers Scott!

--
Stefan

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:51 PM Cantor, Scott <> wrote:

On 11/21/20, 2:41 PM, "Stefan Rasmusson" <> wrote:

>Â Â Ok, could this for example be in the case of using SAML with web services? And then instead of allowing the sender to

> reuse a token for each request would force the sender to get a newly issued one for each request?

I guess.

>Â Â Interesting. Do you mean that implementations generally do not store the assertion id of received assertion and check

> incoming assertion for replay using this? Instead only relying on the NotAfter attributes?

People rarely cluster replay caches, they're per-node and simply hygiene. The main check is against IssueInstant and against the NotOnOrAfter in the SubjectConfirmation.

-- Scott