Biggest threads · sca-assembly-editors

Threads ranked by total message count (canonical subject grouping, cross-month siblings not yet merged). Click to jump to the thread in its home month.

#	Subject	Messages	Date
1	JIRA: Names & Roles for the OASIS SCA Assembly TC	4	Sep 2007
2	Welcome	3	Sep 2007
3	issue clarification	3	Oct 2007
4	Re: [sca-assembly-editors] WD03: Issue resolutions from our Jan 2008f2f have been incorporated	3	Feb 2008
5	Re: [sca-assembly-editors] JIRA: Names & Roles for the OASIS SCAAssembly TC	2	Sep 2007
6	WD03: Issue resolutions from our Jan 2008 f2f have been incorporated	2	Feb 2008
7	Re: [sca-assembly-editors] WD03: Issue resolutions from our Jan 2008 f2fhave been incorporated	2	Feb 2008
8	FW: Issues Tracking System - JIRA - ready to ues now	1	Sep 2007
9	Re: [sca-assembly-editors] JIRA: Names & Roles for the OASIS SCA AssemblyTC	1	Sep 2007
10	spec WD 01	1	Nov 2007
11	Groups - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-WD-01.doc uploaded	1	Nov 2007
12	Groups - sca-assembly-1.1-spec-WD-01.pdf uploaded	1	Nov 2007
13	FW: [sca-policy] OpenCSA TCs: Filename & URL Consistency	1	Jan 2008
14	two requests	1	Feb 2008
15	Re: [sca-assembly] SCA-Assembly XML Schema Files	1	Dec 2008
16	Question about Assembly Spec Chapter 3	1	Dec 2008
17	Agenda for SCA Assembly Test subcommittee conference call, 7th January 2008	1	Jan 2009
18	[ISSUE 98] Conformance Assertion [ASM50012] is invalid - updated proposal	1	Jan 2009
19	[NEW ISSUE] SCA Specification is missing XSD for <definitions/> andConformance statements relating to <definitions/> and <contribution/>	1	Jan 2009
20	RE: [sca-assembly-editors] [NEW ISSUE] SCA Specification is missing XSD for <definitions/> and Conformance statements relating to <definitions/> and <contribution/>	1	Jan 2009
21	SCA Assembly voted to remove Conversational Services from the Assembly 1.1specification	1	Jan 2009
22	Re: [sca-assembly] Public Review of Service Component ArchitectureSpecifications	1	Apr 2009
23	[ASSEMBLY-132] Microsoft technical comment about the SCA Assembly Modelspecification #1 - WAS RE: [sca-assembly] A New SCA Testing TC?	1	Jul 2009
24	[ASSEMBLY-136] Promoting a reference with multiplicity 1..n andtargetsshould default to 0..n - New thoughts	1	Jul 2009
25	RE: [sca-assembly-editors] [ASSEMBLY-132] Microsoft technical comment aboutthe SCA Assembly Model specification #1 - WAS RE: [sca-assembly] A New SCATesting TC?	1	Jul 2009