BTW, I unfortunately will not be able to attend tomorrow's call.
This is just my attempt at representing the approach to the text that we
discussed on the previous call. I am not wedded to it. The group
should feel free to modify it as you see fit. Don't hold up any work on
this for my sake.
Michael
Michael Rowley wrote:
>
> Here is my proposal for section 2.1. It is similar to previous
> attempts, but has been reworked to state its requirements in terms of
> what the "introspected component type" should look like.
>
> Michael
>
