sca-bpel

← back

71 messages · 41 threads

# Subject From Date
00000 [Issue 30] Schema contains ##any for <anyAttribute> Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-01 16:41
00001 Groups - Minutes of the 2009-03-19 conf-call (2009-03-19.html) uploaded [email protected] 2009-04-01 16:44
00002 Groups - Weekly SCA-BPEL telcon modified [email protected] 2009-04-01 16:54
00003 SCA BPEL TA version 4 Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-02 06:07
00004 Raw minutes from 2009-04-02 telcon Danny van der Rijn 2009-04-02 16:02
00005 Raw Chat SCA BPEL Telcon April 2, 2009 ashok malhotra 2009-04-02 17:06
00006 Groups - Minutes of the 2009-03-26 conf-call (2009-03-26.html) uploaded [email protected] 2009-04-02 18:16
00007 invalid namespaces listed in specification Mary McRae 2009-04-04 21:41
00008 Public Review announcement Mary McRae 2009-04-05 15:08
00009 Re: [sca-bpel] invalid namespaces listed in specification Eieter Loenig1 2009-04-05 15:18
00010 Fw: [sca-bpel] invalid namespaces listed in specification Eieter Loenig1 2009-04-05 15:28
00011 Re: Fw: [sca-bpel] invalid namespaces listed in specification Qobin Dover 2009-04-05 18:51
00012 Re: Public Review announcement Jeff Mischkinsky 2009-04-06 18:07
00013 OASIS spec QA checklist Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-08 17:07
00014 NEW ISSUE: Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3013 Patil, Sanjay 2009-04-08 23:46
00015 Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3017 Patil, Sanjay 2009-04-08 23:47
00016 Proposal for resolving ISSUE 33 Patil, Sanjay 2009-04-09 00:21
00017 NEW ISSUE: Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3021 Patil, Sanjay 2009-04-09 00:27
00018 Re: [sca-bpel] [Issue 34] Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3017 Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-09 00:56
00019 Re: [sca-bpel] Issue 35: Incorrect uses of RFC 2119 'MAY' in SBPEL3021 Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-09 00:58
00020 Formatted minutes of 2009-04-02 telcon Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-09 05:52
00021 Groups - Weekly SCA-BPEL telcon modified [email protected] 2009-04-09 06:10
00022 [sca-bpel] Raw minutes from 2009-04-09 telcon Najeeb Andrabi 2009-04-09 15:40
00023 Raw log of 2009-04-09 telcon Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-09 15:41
00024 Groups - SCA-BPEL 1.1 CD 02 Revision 1 (sca-bpel-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1.doc) uploaded [email protected] 2009-04-09 15:48
00025 SCA BPEL TA version 5 Khanderao Kand 2009-04-09 16:01
00026 Groups - SCA_BPEL_Test_Assertions_06.odt uploaded [email protected] 2009-04-11 00:01
00027 Groups - SCA_BPEL_Test_Assertions_06.pdf uploaded [email protected] 2009-04-11 00:02
00028 SCA BPEL TA version 6 Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-11 00:06
00029 Re: [sca-bpel] Re: Public Review announcement Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-15 18:37
00030 Re: [sca-bpel] Re: Public Review announcement Mary McRae 2009-04-15 18:40
00031 Re: [sca-bpel] Re: Public Review announcement Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-15 18:46
00032 Re: [sca-bpel] Re: Public Review announcement Mary McRae 2009-04-15 19:08
00033 Re: [sca-bpel] Re: Public Review announcement Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-15 19:43
00034 Re: [sca-bpel] Re: Public Review announcement Mary McRae 2009-04-15 20:17
00035 Minutes of 2009-04-09 telcon Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-16 06:14
00036 Groups - Minutes of the 2009-04-02 conf-call (2009-04-02.html) uploaded [email protected] 2009-04-16 06:21
00037 Groups - Weekly SCA-BPEL telcon modified [email protected] 2009-04-16 06:30
00038 Formatted minutes of 2009-04-16 telcon Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-18 00:50
00039 Groups - Minutes of the 2009-04-09 conf-call (2009-04-09.html) uploaded [email protected] 2009-04-18 00:59
00040 Groups - Weekly SCA-BPEL telcon modified [email protected] 2009-04-18 01:09
00041 RDDL templates Mary McRae 2009-04-18 01:23
00042 RE: [sca-assembly] RDDL templates Martin Chapman 2009-04-20 16:14
00043 Re: [sca-bpel] RE: [sca-assembly] RDDL templates Mary McRae 2009-04-20 16:46
00044 Groups - sca-bpel-1.1-rddl-200801.html uploaded [email protected] 2009-04-20 20:28
00045 Groups - SCA-BPEL 1.1 CD 02 and PRD 01 (sca-bpel-1.1-spec-cd02.zip) uploaded [email protected] 2009-04-20 20:33
00046 Re: [sca-bpel] RDDL templates Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-20 20:45
00047 Re: [sca-bpel] RDDL templates Mary McRae 2009-04-20 23:42
00048 NEW ISSUE: Is the 'MUST' in section 2.1.2 needed? Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-23 07:06
00049 Re: [sca-bpel] [Issue 38]: Is the 'MUST' in section 2.1.2 needed? Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-23 07:24
00050 Groups - Weekly SCA-BPEL telcon modified [email protected] 2009-04-23 07:25
00051 Raw chat log of 2009-04-23 telcon Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-23 16:08
00052 RE: [sca-assembly] Re: [sca-bpel] RDDL templates Martin Chapman 2009-04-23 18:09
00053 RE: [sca-bpel] [Issue 38]: Is the 'MUST' in section 2.1.2 needed? Michael Rowley 2009-04-23 20:44
00054 Public Review of Service Component Architecture Specifications Mary McRae 2009-04-24 06:18
00055 [sca-bpel] New Issue - References to WS-BPEL 2.0 <partnerLink> Attributes "myRole" and"partnerRole" Eieter Loenig1 2009-04-24 16:47
00056 Subscribing to SCA comments list Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-24 19:01
00057 Re: [sca-policy] Subscribing to SCA comments list David Booz 2009-04-24 19:56
00058 Re: [sca-bpel] Re: [sca-policy] Subscribing to SCA comments list Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-24 20:09
00059 Call for Disclosure Mary McRae 2009-04-24 23:40
00060 RE: [Issue 38]: Is the 'MUST' in section 2.1.2 needed? Mike Edwards 2009-04-27 10:40
00061 RE: [sca-assembly] Re: [sca-bpel] Re: [sca-policy] Subscribing to SCA comments list Martin Chapman 2009-04-27 12:15
00062 RE: [sca-bpel] RE: [Issue 38]: Is the 'MUST' in section 2.1.2needed? Michael Rowley 2009-04-27 13:49
00063 Groups - Weekly SCA-BPEL telcon modified [email protected] 2009-04-27 17:14
00064 RE: [sca-bpel] RE: [Issue 38]: Is the 'MUST' in section 2.1.2 needed? Mike Edwards 2009-04-28 10:33
00065 Formatted minutes of 2009-04-23 telcon Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-30 05:08
00066 [Issue 39] - References to WS-BPEL 2.0 <partnerLink> Attributes "myRole"and "partnerRole" Bnish Larmarkar 2009-04-30 05:29
00067 Groups - Weekly SCA-BPEL telcon modified [email protected] 2009-04-30 05:31
00068 Re: [sca-bpel] [Issue 38]: Is the 'MUST' in section 2.1.2 needed? Anish Karmarkar 2009-04-30 05:55
00069 Minutes of 2009-04-30 TC Call Eieter Loenig1 2009-04-30 16:08
00070 RE: [sca-bpel] [Issue 38]: Is the 'MUST' in section 2.1.2 needed? Michael Rowley 2009-04-30 18:18